Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Debat Aktif untuk Membangun Sikap Demokratis Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32585/cessj.v7i2.7279Abstract
Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) ini meneliti penerapan metode debat aktif untuk membangun sikap demokratis siswa dalam mata pelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila di SMAN 2 Boyolali. Penelitian dua siklus ini melibatkan siswa kelas XI-7 dengan teknik pengumpulan data wawancara, observasi, dan studi dokumen, yang dianalisis secara kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian membuktikan keefektifan metode debat aktif. Rata-rata sikap demokratis siswa meningkat signifikan dari 50% pada pra-siklus menjadi 62,5% pada siklus pertama lalu 87,5% pada siklus 2, dengan indikator toleransi terhadap perbedaan mencapai 100%. Partisipasi siswa juga naik dari 68,75% menjadi 93,75%. Peningkatan ini didukung oleh pendekatan terstruktur, pengalaman belajar nyata, dan peran guru sebagai fasilitator. Tantangan seperti ketimpangan partisipasi dan manajemen waktu berhasil diatasi melalui pelatihan debat, pembagian peran, dan evaluasi berbasis umpan balik. Kesimpulannya, debat aktif efektif membentuk sikap demokratis ketika didukung perencanaan matang, topik kontekstual, dan lingkungan inklusif. Implikasinya, guru disarankan mengadopsi metode interaktif ini untuk menciptakan pembelajaran yang partisipatif. Penelitian lanjutan dapat mengembangkan modul debat berbasis isu lokal agar pendidikan demokrasi tidak hanya teoritis tetapi juga melatih keterampilan sosial siswa sebagai warga negara.
Referensi
Abdussamad, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Syakir Media Press.
Arends, R. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Arends, R. (2015). Learning to teach (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bernadetta, S., dkk. (2021). Action research in education: Theory and practice. Routledge.
Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan.
Hattie, J. (2009). *Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement*. Routledge.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2014). Cooperative learning in the classroom. Interaction Book Company.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2022). Panduan pembelajaran pendidikan Pancasila fase F. Kemendikbud.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2021). Pedoman implementasi kurikulum merdeka. Kemendikbudristek.
Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam.
Lie, A., dkk. (2020). Debate pedagogy in Asian contexts. Springer.
Majid, A., & Rochman, C. (2020). Pembelajaran interaktif: Teori dan praktik. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Murdiyana, E. (2020). Validitas data penelitian kualitatif. Universitas Brawijaya Press.
Nurdin, E. S. (2022). Model debat aktif dalam pembelajaran. Prenadamedia Group.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton University Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Rosenberg, M. J. (2021). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age (2nd ed.). Pfeiffer.
Sapriya. (2012). Pendidikan kewarganegaraan: Konsep dan pembelajaran. Rosda.
Sapriya. (2019). Pendidikan nilai dalam pembelajaran PKn. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Slavin, R. E. (2014). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Suharsimi, A. (2006). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Edisi Revisi). Rineka Cipta.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Zamroni. (2017). Dinamika pendidikan karakter. UNY Press.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Luqman Wijayanto, Machmud Al Rasyid, Winarno

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Civics Education and Social Science Journal (CESSJ) agree to the following terms:
- The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
in 2025, The Author

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



