Manajemen Mutu di Laboratorium Kateterisasi Jantung

Authors

  • Sidhi Laksono FK UHAMKA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32585/jmiak.v7i1.3636

Keywords:

cathlab, mutu layanan, penjaminan mutu, peningkatan mutu

Abstract

Tindakan intervensi jantung pada laboratorium kateterisasi (cathlab) merupakan tindakan yang dapat mengurangi morbiditas dan mortalitas. Dengan meningkatnya jumlah tindakan dan tingginya biaya prosedur dan komplikasi, diperlukan manajemen mutu layanan di laboratorium kateterisasi. Mutu layanan tersebut berguna untuk memberikan standar tinggi pada keselamatan pasien dengan mengembangkan proses dan system yang mengoptimalkan interaksi pasien dengan tim cathlab. Penjaminan mutu (Quality Assurance, QA) dan peningkatan mutu (Quality Improvement, QI) merupakan program dalam mempertahankan mutu layanan di RS. Artikel tinjauan ini akan membahas secara singkat mengenai QA dan QI di cathlab dalam rangka mencapai keselamatan pasien.

References

Accreditation for Cardiovascular Excellence: Quality in Invasive Cardiovascular Care (2015) ‘ACE standards for catheterization laboratory accreditation’, pp. 1–22.

Bashore, T.M. et al. (2012) ‘2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards update: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus documents developed in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and Society for Vascular Medicine.’, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 59(24), pp. 2221–2305. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.010.

Blankenship, J.C. et al. (2019) ‘SCAI/ACVP expert consensus statement on cardiovascular catheterization laboratory economics: If the cath lab is your home you should understand its finances: This statement was endorsed by the Alliance of Cardiovascular Professionals (ACVP) in April 2019’, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 94(1), pp. 123–135. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28330.

Brennan, J.M. et al. (2013) ‘Enhanced mortality risk prediction with a focus on high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 1,208,137 procedures in the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry).’, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 6(8), pp. 790–799. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2013.03.020.

Brownlee, S.A., Whitson, P.J. and Ibrahim, A.M. (2019) ‘Measuring and Improving the Design Quality of Operating Rooms.’, Surgical infections, 20(2), pp. 102–106. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2018.291.

Care, A. for C.E.Q. in I.C. (2015) ‘ACE standards for catheterization laboratory accreditation’, pp. 1–22.

Chalikias, G., Drosos, I. and Tziakas, D.N. (2016) ‘Prevention of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: an Update.’, Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 30(5), pp. 515–524. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-016-6683-0.

Faxon, D.P. and Burgess, A. (2016) ‘Cardiovascular Registries: Too Much of Good Thing?’, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions. United States, p. e003866. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003866.

Gurm, H.S. et al. (2013) ‘A novel tool for reliable and accurate prediction of renal complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.’, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 61(22), pp. 2242–2248. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.026.

Institute for Healthcare Improvement (no date) Hospital flow professional development program. Available at: http://www.ihi.org/education/InPersonTraining/Hospital-Flow-Professional-Development-Program/Pages/default. aspx.

Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (2017) ‘The IAC standards and guidelines for cardiovascular catheterization accreditation’, pp. 3–83.

Jennings, H.S. 3rd et al. (2015) ‘SCAI core curriculum for adult and pediatric interventional fellowship training in continuous quality assessment and improvement.’, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 86(3), pp. 422–431. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.26029.

Klein, L.W. et al. (2011) ‘Quality assessment and improvement in interventional cardiology: a position statement of the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, part 1: standards for quality assessment and improvement in interventional cardiology.’, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 77(7), pp. 927–935. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.22982.

Laksono, S. (2022). Kelelahan tenagan kesehatan professional: suatu tinjauan pustaka. Jurnal Manajemen Informasi dan Administrasi Kesehatan, 5(2), pp 31-7.

Laksono, S. dan Imronikha E. (2023). Peran dokter umum dalam perawatan pasien paska sindroma coroner akut: suatu tinjauan pustaka. Jurnal Medika Hutama, 4(1), pp 3348-58.

Manghani, K. (2011) ‘Quality assurance: Importance of systems and standard operating procedures.’, Perspectives in clinical research, 2(1), pp. 34–37. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.76288.

Moore, L. et al. (2015) ‘Donabedian’s structure-process-outcome quality of care model: Validation in an integrated trauma system.’, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 78(6), pp. 1168–1175. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000663.

Munawar, M. et al. (2018) ‘Pedoman Laboratorium Kateterisasi Jantung Dan Pembuluh Darah’, Jurnal Kardiologi Indonesia, pp. 10–27.

Patel, M.R. et al. (2017) ‘ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.’, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 69(17), pp. 2212–2241. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.001.

Quality Improvement for Institutions (no date) Features and benefits of cardiac Cath lab accreditation. Available at: https://cvquality.acc.org/accreditation/services/CCL/ CCLBenefits.

Rao, S. V et al. (2013) ‘An updated bleeding model to predict the risk of post-procedure bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report using an expanded bleeding definition from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry.’, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 6(9), pp. 897–904. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.016.

The Joint Commission (no date) High Reliability Healthcare. Available at: https://www.jointcommission.org/ resources/news-and-multimedia/blogs/high-reliability-healthcare/.

Tsai, T.T. et al. (2014) ‘Contemporary incidence, predictors, and outcomes of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the NCDR Cath-PCI registry.’, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 7(1), pp. 1–9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2013.06.016.

Walker, M. et al. (2016) ‘Stop the Blame Game: Restructuring Morbidity and Mortality Conferences to Teach Patient Safety and Quality Improvement to Residents.’, MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 12, p. 10475. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10475.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-19

Issue

Section

Article