KEPRIBADIAN TOKOH UTAMA DALAM NOVEL JALAN MERAIH BINTANG KARYA FATHOR ROSYID: KAJIAN PSIKOLOGI SASTRA DAN IMPLEMENTASINYA SEBAGAI BAHAN AJAR SASTRA DI SD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32585/.v4i1.103Abstract
This research aims to describe; 1) the novel structure of Way Reach For the Stars work Fathor Rosyid, 2) psychological aspects of personality the main character in the novel Street Reach For the Stars work Fathor Rosyid, 3) the problems underlying the actions taken by the main character in the novel Street Reach For the Stars work Fathor Rosyid, and 4) the implementation of the structure and personality of the main character in the novel Jalan Fathor Rosyid Reach For the Stars work in teaching literature at primary school. This study is the qualitative descriptive case study technique spikes. The data in this study is a phrase, word, sentence, and discourse contained in Jalan novel Fatror Rosyid Reach For the Stars work. The data collection technique used is the technique read, record, and libraries. Data validation techniques used are terianggulasi engineering data and triangulation theory. The sampling technique used is the technique of sampling proposive. And data analysis techniques used are heuristic and hermeneutic reading techniques. Based on the results of data analysis can be concluded; 1) The structure of the novel Jalan Fathor Rosyidmeliputi Reach For the Stars work; theme, mandate, characterization, plot, and setting. 2) The psychological aspect in the personality of the main character's novel Street Reach For the Stars Fatror Rosyid works include; confident in making decisions, caring for others, intelligent, hard working spirit for the sake of ambition, curiosity, and impatient. 3) the problem underlying the main character in the novel action Jalan Reach For the Stars work Fathor Rosyid is ekonimi family problems, physical conflict to help a friend, and the pursuit of ideals. 4) implementation of research results and personality structure of the main characters in the novel Jalan Fathor Rosyid Reach For the Stars work can be an alternative teaching materials literature on learning literature in primary school because there is conformity with the selection criteria for instructional materials delivered by Moddy and in accordance with the syllabus and lesson plans.
Keywords:the educational value, the personality, novels, psychology literature,
Downloads
References
Ahmadi, Abu. 1985. Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.
Ahmadi, A. 2003. Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Aji, Antonius Wagiyoto Topo. 2004. Keterbacaan isi, Kebahasaan, dan Budaya di dalam Cerita Pendek oleh Siswa SMA. TESIS. Bandung: UPI. (tidak diterbitkan).
AL Ma’ruf, Ali Imron. 2005.Demensi Sosial Keagamaan dalam Fiksi Indonesia Modern. Solo: Smart Media.
_______. 2010. Kajian Stilistika Perspektif Kritik Holistik. Surakarta: UNS Press.
Aminuddin. 1987. Pengantar Apresiasi Sastra. Malang: IKIP Malang.
Aminuddin, Ed. 1990. “Metodologi Pengajaran Sastra” dalam Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Bidang Bahasa dan Sastra. Malang: Yayasan Asih Asah Asuh.
_______ . 1992. Pengembangan Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Bidang Bahasa dan Sastra. Malang: Yayasan Asah Asih Asuh.
_______ . 2009. Pengantar Apresiasi Karya Sastra. Bandung: Sinar Baru.
Anwar. 2001. Unsur Sastra. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Depdiknas. 2000. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Depdiknas. 2006. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 22 Tahun 2006. Tentang Standar Isi. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Dewan Bahasa. 1974. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Kuala Lumpur: _____.
Endraswara, Suwardi. 2003. Metodologi Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Media Pressindo.
_______ . 2003.”Penelitian Psikologi Sastra” dalam Metodologi Penelitian Sastra; Epistemologi, Model,, Teori, dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta. Widyatama.
_______ . 2008. Metode Penelitian Psikologi Sastra: Teori, Langkah, dan Penerapannya. Yogyakarta: FBS UNY.
Esten, Mursal. 1984. Kesusastraan: Pengantar Teori dan Sejarah. Bandung: Angkasa.
Fanani, M., dkk. 1997. Analisis Struktur dan Nilai Budaya. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa.
Fananie, Zainuddin 2002. Telaah Sastra. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press.
Freud, Sigmund. 2006. Psikoanalisis Sigmund Freud. Terjemahan K. Bertens. Surabaya: Ikon Teralitera.
Hardjana, A. (1991). Kritik Sastra: Sebuah Pengantar. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Huck, Charlotte S, Susasn Hepler, dan Janes Hickman. 1987. Children’s Literatur in The Elementary School. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Ibrahim. 1986. Kesusatraan. Jakarta: Karunika.
Jobling, D. 1986. The Sense of Biblical Narrative. Structural Analyses in The Hebrew Bible. Sheffield: Redwood Burn Ltd. Trowbridge, Wiltshire.
Luxemburg, Jan Van. 1986. Pengantar Ilmu Sastra. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Nugrahani, Farida. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Teori dan Aprlikasi. Surakarta: UNS Press.
Nugrahani, Farida. 2008. ”Pembelajaran Sastra yang Apresiatif di SMA Surakarta dalam Perspektif Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Studi Evaluasi”. Disertasi. Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas maret surakarta.
Nugrahani, Farida. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Solo: Cakra Books.
Nugrahani, Farida & Al-ma’ruf, Ali Imron. 2017. Pengkajian Sastra Teori dan Aplikasi. Surakarta: Djiwa Amarta Press.
Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. 1995. Teori Pengkajian Fiksi. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Prihatmi, Sri Rahayu. 1990. Dari Muchtar Lubis hingga Mangun Wijaya. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Prihatmi, Sri Rahayu. 1998. Dari Muchtar Lubis hingga Mangun Wijaya. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Ratna, Nyoman Kutha. 2004. Penelitian Sasta, Teori, Metode dan Teknik Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Rosenblatt, Louise M. 1983. Literature as Exploration (Third Ed.). New York: The Modern Language Association of America
Semi, M. Attar. 1988. Anatomi Sastra. Padang: Angkasa Raya.
_______ .1990. Analisa Sastra. Padang: Angkasa Raya.
_______ .1993. Analisa Sastra. Padang: Angkasa Raya.
Siswanto, Wahyudi. 2008. Pengantar Teori Sastra. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.
Satoto, Soediro. 1989. Metode Penelitian Sastra. Surakarta: UNS Press.
_______ .1993. Metode Penelitian Sastra. Surakarta: UNS Press.
Stanton, Robert. 2007. Teori Fiksi Robert Stanton. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sutopo, HB. 1976.Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Surakarta: UNS Press.
_______ .1996. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Surakarta: UNS Press.
Sudjiman, Panuti. 1988. Kamus Istilah Sastra. Jakarta: Gramedia.
_______ .1992. Kamus Istilah Sastra. Jakarta: Gramedia.
_______ .1997. Kamus Istilah Sastra. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Suharianto, S. 2005. Dasar-Dasar Teori Sastra. Surakarta: Widya Duta.
Sujanto, Agus, dkk. 2008. Psikologi Kepribadian. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
_______. 2009. Psikologi Kepribadian. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sumardjo, Jakop dan Saini K.M. 1988. Apresiasi Kesusasteraan. Jakarta: Gramedia.
_______ . 1991. Apresiasi Kesusasteraan. Jakarta: Gramedia.
_______ . 1997. Apresiasi Kesusasteraan. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Suryabrata, Sumadi. 2003.Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakata: PT Raja Grafindo
Tarigan, HG. 1982.Motodologi Pengajaran Bahasa. Bandung: Angkasa
Teeuw, A. 2003. Sastera dan Ilmu Sastera. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.
Wellek, Rene dan Austin Warren. 1982. Teori Kesusatraan. Terjemahan Melani Budianta. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Widayati, Mukti. 2017. Forgrouding dalam Kumpulan Cerpen Adam Ma’rifat karya Danarto. Jurnal Stilistika Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pembelajarannya. Volume 3 No. 1 Februari 2017.