Analisis Yuridis Prinsip Single Economic Entity dalam Notifikasi Akuisisi Saham PT Tamaris Hidro

Authors

  • Surahman Surahman Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur
  • Dhaifa Nisrina Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur
  • Marwah M. Idris Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur
  • M. Jordi Primasakti Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur
  • Muhammad Ananda Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur
  • Muhammad Mirza Rohadi Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur
  • Nurul Zahwany Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur
  • Ria Wanda Karmelia Noor Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur
  • Safira Dina Fakhirah Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur
  • Siskawati Melinda Rifiyanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur
  • Sri Kandy Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur
  • Tri Aulia Akbar Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur
  • M. Rezy Abdurrahman Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32585/jbfe.v6i1.6810

Keywords:

Business Competition, Merger Notification, Single Economic Entity Doctrine, KPPU

Abstract

Fair business competition is guaranteed in Law Number 5 of 1999, including the obligation to notify mergers or acquisitions. However, the case of PT Tamaris Hidro vs. KPPU highlights the ambiguity in this regulation, especially regarding the application of the Single Economic Entity Doctrine. PT Tamaris Hidro argued that the notification obligation had been fulfilled by PT Patria Bakti Abadi, but the KPPU rejected the claim and imposed a fine of IDR 10 billion. This study uses a normative legal approach to analyze the legal basis in decision Number 4/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2024/PN.Niaga Jkt Pst. The results of the study show that the KPPU regulation has not accommodated business entities with complex ownership structures. As a result, parent companies are still required to make separate notifications, even though they are in the same business group. The implications of this finding emphasize the need to revise the KPPU regulation to be more adaptive to the dynamics of modern business. This study recommends further research on the application of the Single Economic Entity Doctrine in competition law in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. M. T. Anggraini, "Penerapan doktrin Single Economic Entity dalam putusan-putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha," Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum, vol. 2, no. 2, 2020.

D. Dirwansyah, "Doktrin Single Economic Entity dalam perluasan pengawasan persaingan usaha secara ekstrateritorial di Indonesia," Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1326–1336, 2024.

I. A. Darmawan, I. Ikhwansyah, and P. Faisal, "Cross-border business competition: Keabsahan dan hambatan penerapan prinsip ekstrateritorial dalam penegakan hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia," Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 113–126, 2018.

F. Junita, I. I. Soeparna, and R. Kesumawardhani, "Internationalization of small and medium enterprises in Indonesia: Towards integrative policy approach of competitiveness and connectivity," Yuridika, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 150–168, 2023.

W. Wati and A. M. T. Anggraini, "Pengaturan doktrin Single Economic Entity: Studi perbandingan Indonesia dan Uni Eropa: Regulation of the Single Economic Entity doctrine: A comparative study between Indonesia and the European Union," Amicus Curiae, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 221–231, 2025.

Z. H. Musyafak, D. M. Atriani, D. U. Hasanah, A. Y. Sari, and Y. Astarina, "Analisis akuisisi perusahaan menurut hukum persaingan usaha dan pengaruhnya terhadap profitabilitas perusahaan," Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, vol. 1, no. 4, p. 16, 2024.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, 1999.

Y. S. Putra, L. Sardana, R. Disurya, and N. Herlina, "Peran Komisi Pengawasan Persaingan Usaha dalam menjaga persaingan usaha sehat di Indonesia," Journal of Syntax Literate, vol. 9, no. 10, 2024.

K. Toha, "Urgensi amandemen UU tentang persaingan usaha di Indonesia: Problem dan tantangan," Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 76, 2019.

E. Istiyanti, Analisis hukum persaingan usaha terhadap holdingisasi BUMN berdasarkan konsep “Single Economic Entity” doctrine, Disertasi Doktoral, Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2024.

K. Hutapea, Penerapan prinsip ekstrateritorialitas dalam penegakan hukum persaingan usaha (Studi Putusan KPPU Nomor: 7/KPPU-L/2007 tentang kasus Temasek), Disertasi Doktoral, Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2018.

Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat, Putusan Nomor 4/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2024, 2024.

European Union, Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://eurlex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/treaty-on-the-functioning-of-the-european-union.html

Downloads

Published

2025-06-13

How to Cite

Surahman Surahman, Dhaifa Nisrina, Marwah M. Idris, M. Jordi Primasakti, Muhammad Ananda, Muhammad Mirza Rohadi, Nurul Zahwany, Ria Wanda Karmelia Noor, Safira Dina Fakhirah, Siskawati Melinda Rifiyanti, Sri Kandy, Tri Aulia Akbar, & M. Rezy Abdurrahman. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Prinsip Single Economic Entity dalam Notifikasi Akuisisi Saham PT Tamaris Hidro. Journal of Business, Finance, and Economics (JBFE), 6(1), 346–354. https://doi.org/10.32585/jbfe.v6i1.6810