The Relationship Between Literacy Sklls and Scientific Explanation on Students Scientific Reasoning Throught Reading Concept Map-Numbered Head Together Learning Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32585/jbl.v7i2.6798Keywords:
Remap NHT, Literation, Scientific Explanation, Scintific reasoningAbstract
Literacy skills play an important role in helping students clarify basic concepts, build relationships between concepts, reason and test each detail of each interrelated information and are able to derive each concept, thus students are accustomed to understanding each scientific process and activity carried out in Biology learning. The relationship between these two skills trains students to actively carry out in-depth scientific investigations.The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship between scientific literacy skills and scientific explanation skills in empowering scientific reasoning skills through the application of the Remap-NHT (Reading Concept Map-Numbered Head Together) learning model. This study included a quasi-experiment using a non-equivalent pretest-post-test control group design with a total sample of 85 eleventh grade students in the Natural Sciences department at SMAN 4 Malang in the 2023/2024 academic year. The population was distributed into 3 groups. Scientific literacy skills and scientific reasoning skills were assessed using an essay test, while scientific explanation skills were assessed using an assessment rubric. Data analysis was tested using multiple regression analysis. The results showed that (1) there was a significant relationship between scientific literacy skills and scientific reasoning skills; (2) there is a significant relationship between scientific explanation skills and scientific reasoning skills; and (3) there is a significant relationship between scientific literacy skills and scientific explanation skills that have an integral effect on scientific reasoning skills. The interrelationship between scientific literacy skills, scientific explanation skills and scientific reasoning skills can be observed in the regression equation Y = 0.317 * X1 + 0.995 * X2 + 30.113. Based on the findings, it is concluded that Remap-NHT is able to improve students' scientific literacy skills, scientific explanation skills, and scientific reasoning skills, the interrelationships of which influence each other.
Downloads
References
Adawiyah, R., Zubaidah, S., Listyorini, D., & Astriani, M. (2021). The potential of Remap NHT in improving motivation and academic achievement. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043280
Al Sultan, A., Henson, H., & Lickteig, D. (2021). Assessing preservice elementary teachers’ conceptual understanding of scientific literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102, 103327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103327
Alt, D., & Raichel, N. (2020). Enhancing perceived digital literacy skills and creative self-concept through gamified learning environments: Insights from a longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Research, 101, 101561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101561
Atesgoz, N. N., & Sak, U. (2021). Test of scientific creativity animations for children: Development and validity study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100818
Berndt, M., Schmidt, F. M., Sailer, M., Fischer, F., Fischer, M. R., & Zottmann, J. M. (2021). Investigating statistical literacy and scientific reasoning and argumentation in medical-, social sciences-, and economics students. Learning and Individual Differences, 86, 101963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101963
Bilik, O., Kankaya, E. A., & Deveci, Z. (2020). Effects of web-based concept mapping education on students’ concept mapping and critical thinking skills: A double blind, randomized, controlled study. Nurse Education Today, 86, 104312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104312
Bishop, J., & Ph, D. (2021). Century skills (P21).
Camacho, M. P. (2021). Beyond descriptive accuracy: The central dogma of molecular biology in scientific practice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 86, 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.01.002
Danovitch, J. H., Mills, C. M., Duncan, R. G., Williams, A. J., & Girouard, L. N. (2021). Developmental changes in children’s recognition of the relevance of evidence to causal explanations. Cognitive Development, 58, 101017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101017
Danovitch, J. H., Mills, C. M., Sands, K. R., & Williams, A. J. (2021). Mind the gap: How incomplete explanations influence children’s interest and learning behaviors. Cognitive Psychology, 130, 101421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101421
Demirtas, B., & Karaduman, G. B. (2021). Adaptation of the SenSel Creativity-Sensitization and Self Questionnaire for educators and teachers into Turkish and its relationship with mathematical thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100790
Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Towards data science literacy. Procedia Computer Science, 108, 2151–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.240
Dolnicar, D., Podgornik, B. B., Bartol, T., & Sorgo, A. (2020). Added value of secondary school education toward development of information literacy of adolescents. Library and Information Science Research, 42(2), 101016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2020.101016
Ekman, K. (2021). Making sense of sensing: Scaffolding community knowledge in an online informal scientific engagement. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30, 100537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100537
Haber, A. S., Leech, K. A., Benton, D. T., Dashoush, N., & Corriveau, K. H. (2021). Questions and explanations in the classroom: Examining variation in early childhood teachers’ responses to children’s scientific questions. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 57, 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.05.008
Hamadi, M., El-Den, J., Azam, S., & Sriratanaviriyakul, N. (2021). Integrating social media as cooperative learning tool in higher education classrooms: An empirical study. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.12.007
Hernandez-Torrano, D., & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975–2019). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625
Irawan, F. (2022). Relationship of student creative thinking skills with literacy. Celebes Science Education, 1(1). [DOI not available]
Irawan, F., Zubaidah, S., Sulisetijono, & Astriani, M. (2021). Does Remap-NHT have the potential to promote students’ scientific reasoning skills? AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043179
Irawan, F., Zubaidah, S., & Sulisetijono, S. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran Remap NHT terhadap pemberdayaan keterampilan literasi sains peserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 5(8), 1086–1095. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i8.13880
Ivanova, O., Gnatyshina, E., Uvarina, N., Korneeva, N., & Savchenkov, A. (2021). The wheel of science: A model for managing scientific activities in higher education as a factor in developing flexible skills of the youth in the region. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100928
Jach, L., & Buczek, A. (2021). Who says yes to science without ethics? Acceptance of the violation of ethical norms due to scientific reasons in the context of empathy, systemizing, and the scientistic worldview. Personality and Individual Differences, 179, 110950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110950
James, K. A., Everall, A. C., Cadel, L., McCarthy, L. M., Lofters, A., Thompson, A., & Guilcher, S. J. T. (2022). Exploring medication self-management in community-dwelling adults with chronic medication experience: A concept mapping study. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 18(5), 2854–2866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.07.001
Kalkan, O. K., Altun, A., & Atar, B. (2020). Role of teacher-related factors and educational resources in science literacy: An international perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67, 100935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100935
Leal Filho, W., Wall, T., Lange Salvia, A., Frankenberger, F., Hindley, A., Mifsud, M., Brandli, L., & Will, M. (2021). Trends in scientific publishing on sustainability in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 296, 126569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126569
Lei, H., Xiong, Y., Chiu, M. M., Zhang, J., & Cai, Z. (2021). The relationship between ICT literacy and academic achievement among students: A meta-analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 127, 106123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106123
Li, F. Y., Hwang, G. J., Chen, P. Y., & Lin, Y. J. (2021). Effects of a concept mapping-based two-tier test strategy on students’ digital game-based learning performances and behavioral patterns. Computers and Education, 173, 104293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104293
Li, L., Shi, J., Wu, D., & Li, H. (2020). Only child, parental educational expectation, self-expectation and science literacy in Zhuang adolescents in China: A serial mediation model. Children and Youth Services Review, 115, 105084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105084
Liebech-Lien, B. (2021). Teacher teams – A support or a barrier to practising cooperative learning? Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, 103453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103453
Lobczowski, N. G., Allen, E. M., Firetto, C. M., Greene, J. A., & Murphy, P. K. (2020). An exploration of social regulation of learning during scientific argumentation discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63, 101925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101925
Luo, M., Sun, D., Zhu, L., & Yang, Y. (2021). Evaluating scientific reasoning ability: Student performance and the interaction effects between grade level, gender, and academic achievement level. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100899
Ma, Y., & Qin, X. (2021). Measurement invariance of information, communication and technology (ICT) engagement and its relationship with student academic literacy: Evidence from PISA 2018. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100982
Matsumoto-Royo, K., & Ramirez-Montoya, M. S. (2021). Core practices in practice-based teacher education: A systematic literature review of its teaching and assessment process. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101047
Oliveira, A. W., Brown, A. O., Zhang, W. S., LeBrun, P., Eaton, L., & Yemen, S. (2021). Fostering creativity in science learning: The potential of open-ended student drawing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103416
Pagliaro, M. (2020). Enhancing the use of e-mail in scientific research and in the academy. Heliyon, 6(1), e03087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03087
Palma, N., & Reis, J. (2021). Can autocracy promote literacy? Evidence from a cultural alignment success story. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 186, 412–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.02.011
Pena-Ayala, A. (2021). A learning design cooperative framework to instill 21st century education. Telematics and Informatics, 62, 101632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101632
Polat, O., & Aydin, E. (2020). The effect of mind mapping on young children’s critical thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100743
Putra, D. J., & Rahman, Z. (2019). The role of guidance and counseling teacher in solving students’ learning difficulties in physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(3), 032056. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032056
Rainey, E. C., Maher, B. L., & Moje, E. B. (2020). Learning disciplinary literacy teaching: An examination of preservice teachers’ literacy teaching in secondary subject area classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 94, 103123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103123
Reiska, P., Soika, K., Mollits, A., Rannikmae, M., & Soobard, R. (2015). Using concept mapping method for assessing students’ scientific literacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 352–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.357
Ren, Z., Zhang, Q., Cheng, J., Hao, F., & Gao, X. (2021). Segment spatial-temporal representation and cooperative learning of convolution neural networks for multimodal-based action recognition. Neurocomputing, 433, 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.12.020
Sewasew, D., & Koester, L. S. (2019). The developmental dynamics of students’ reading self-concept and reading competence: Examining reciprocal relations and ethnic-background patterns. Learning and Individual Differences, 73, 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.05.010
Tan, J., Yang, Z., Cheng, Y., Ye, J., Wang, B., & Dai, Q. (2021). SRAGL-AWCL: A two-step multi-view clustering via sparse representation and adaptive weighted cooperative learning. Pattern Recognition, 117, 107987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2021.107987
Tikva, C., & Tambouris, E. (2021). A systematic mapping study on teaching and learning computational thinking through programming in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100849
Wankhede, D. (2020). Intergenerational changes in issues related to the education of the cobbler community in Mumbai. International Journal of Educational Development, 79, 102214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102214
Woody, A. I. (2015). Re-orienting discussions of scientific explanation: A functional perspective. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 52, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.03.005
Yildiz, C., & Yildiz, T. G. (2021). Exploring the relationship between scientific reasoning and scientific process skills of preschool children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100795
Zahra, F., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Astriani, M. (2021). The improvement of students’ argumentation skills through Remap-NHT learning model. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043291
Zhang, J., & Chen, B. (2021). The effect of cooperative learning on critical thinking of nursing students in clinical practicum: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37(1), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.05.008
Zhou, C. (2021). The effectiveness of 5E model to improve the scientific creativity of teachers in rural areas. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100900
Zoubi, R. A. (2021). The impact of media and information literacy on acquiring the critical thinking skill by the educational faculty’s students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100782
Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D., Mahanal, S., & Mistianah. (2018). Revealing the relationship between reading interest and critical thinking skills through Remap GI and Remap Jigsaw. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1124a
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ferry irawan, Sri Ananda Pertiwi, Nur Zakiyah R, Henita A
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal of Biology Learning agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
