Community Social Activities in Kapita Village in Supporting the Sustainability of the Community Forest Management Program

Authors

  • Suprianto Universitas Islam Makassar
  • Amal Said Universitas Islam Makassar
  • Helda Ibramin Universitas Islam Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32585/jbfe.v6i2.7363

Keywords:

Community Participation, Ecological Sustainability, Social Forestry, Socio-Economic Aspects, Sustainability Index

Abstract

Community Forest Management (PHKM) is one of the social forestry programs aimed at improving community welfare while maintaining forest sustainability. The sustainability of this program is greatly influenced by the level of community participation. This study aims to analyze the sustainability level of the Community Forest Management (HKM) program based on community participation. The research was conducted in Kapita Village, Bangkala District, Jeneponto Regency, reviewed from social, economic, and ecological aspects from July 24, 2025 to August 31, 2025, using a mixed methods approach. Data were collected through structured interviews with questionnaires involving 134 respondents who were members of forest farmer groups, in-depth interviews, and field observations. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, sustainability index calculation, and qualitative triangulation to strengthen the findings. The results show that the social aspect achieved a sustainability index of 63.7% or a score of 3.64, the economic aspect obtained an average score of 3.50, and the ecological aspect reached 3.69, all categorized as moderately sustainable. The Combined Sustainability Index (CSI) of the three aspects was 3.61, placing the PHKM program in the moderately sustainable category. This study concludes that PHKM has had a positive impact on social and economic life as well as environmental conservation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andayani, N., Suryanto, P., & Kartodihardjo, H. (2020). Evaluation of the sustainability of community forest management based on ecological indicators. Journal of Forestry Policy Analysis, 17(1), 45–60. Faculty of Forestry, University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung.

Central Statistics Agency (BPS) of Jeneponto Regency. (2023). Jeneponto Regency in figures 2023. BPS Jeneponto Regency, Bontosunggu.

Directorate General of PSKL KLHK. (2022). Annual report of the Directorate General of Social Forestry and Environmental Partnerships 2022. Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Jakarta.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2021). Forest governance by Indigenous and Tribal Peoples. FAO, Rome.

Fitriani, Y., & Hidayat, S. (2021). Socio-economic and ecological performance of community forest management in Central Kalimantan. Journal of Forestry Science, 15(2), 78–90. Center for Research and Development of Socio-Economic Policy and Climate Change, Bogor.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). Sixth assessment report (AR6): Synthesis report. IPCC Secretariat, Geneva.

Lestari, D., & Hamzah, A. (2021). The impact of land conversion on forest degradation in Jeneponto Regency. Journal of Environment and Forestry, 13(1), 32–45. Faculty of Forestry, Hasanuddin University, Makassar.

Maryudi, A., & Krott, M. (2018). Power in community-based forest management: The politics of devolution in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 90, 32–39. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.01.006

Nugroho, B. A., Setiawan, Y., & Riyanto, B. (2019). Strengthening local institutions in community forest management in Central Java. Journal of Forestry Policy, 13(3), 201–218. Center for Research and Development of Socio-Economic Policy and Climate Change, Bogor.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763

Ramadhan, F., & Nugraha, R. (2021). Coordination barriers in the implementation of the PHKM program in Southeast Sulawesi. Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, 11(1), 25–36. Faculty of Forestry, Halu Oleo University, Kendari.

Rosita, I., & Kurniawan, T. (2022). Evaluation of the PHKM program policy in socially and ecologically vulnerable areas. Journal of Environmental Policy Analysis, 14(2), 85–97. Faculty of Forestry, University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung.

Safitri, M., Sari, R. F., & Nuraini, R. (2020). Issues of access and capacity in community forest management in Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Law, 5(1), 17–30. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.38011/jhli.v5i1.138

Subarudi, & Herawati, T. (2022). Monitoring and evaluation of the sustainability of the PHKM program: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Forestry Planning, 16(2), 51–65. Center for Forest Research and Development, Bogor.

Suwarno, A., Idrus, A., & Wahyuni, S. (2019). Analysis of PHKM sustainability in NTB: A socio-ecological perspective. Journal of Tropical Forestry Science, 11(1), 63–75. Center for Forest Research and Development, Bogor.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 41 of 1999 concerning Forestry. (1999). State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia. Jakarta.

World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.

Wulandari, C., & Inoue, M. (2018). The importance of social capital in collaborative forest management in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 90, 144–154. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.01.018

Yatim, M., Salim, R., & Nur, L. (2025). Sustainability of social forestry programs in eastern Indonesia: Index and institutional approaches. Pustaka Alam Lestari.

Yustika, A. E. (2020). Economic vs. ecological aspects in the implementation of PHKM: A case study in Java. Journal of Environmental Economics and Development, 18(3), 91–104. Center for Research and Development of Socio-Economic Policy and Climate Change, Bogor.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-12

How to Cite

Suprianto, Amal Said, & Helda Ibramin. (2025). Community Social Activities in Kapita Village in Supporting the Sustainability of the Community Forest Management Program. Journal of Business, Finance, and Economics (JBFE), 6(2), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.32585/jbfe.v6i2.7363

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.