Strategies to Improve The Performance of Private University Employees in South Tangerang with Importance Performance Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32585/jbfe.v6i2.7582Keywords:
Employee Performance, Higher Education Management, Importance–Performance Analysis, Motivation, Organizational LeadershipAbstract
Private Universities (PTS) play an important role in the provision of competitive higher education services, but face challenges in ensuring that the performance of human resources (HR) remains optimal to meet the demands of service quality, accreditation, and stakeholder expectations. The main problem that arises is the gap between the performance attributes that employees consider important and the actual perceived performance, which has an impact on motivation, work effectiveness, and institutional competitiveness. This study aims to diagnose employee performance attributes at PTS by focusing on identifying priority attributes, measuring the gap between the level of importance and performance, and formulating performance improvement strategies that can be implemented practically by management. The method used is Importance–Performance Analysis (IPA) with 20 attributes that are evaluated through two dimensions: importance and performance. The results showed that the attribute of reward for work performance (MT4) was in Quadrant I, indicating high importance but low performance so that it required immediate intervention. Meanwhile, the attributes of leadership, discipline, and communication are in Quadrant II as organizational strengths that need to be maintained. These findings indicate the need to strengthen the reward system, leadership appreciation practices, and motivation strategies based on recognition and development. In conclusion, IPA is able to provide an evidence-based overview of priorities that help private universities effectively allocate resources to improve human resource performance and strengthen institutional competitive advantage.
Downloads
References
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617095
Hartati, S., Puspita Sari, K., & Abadi, S. (2018). Model perancangan strategi peningkatan kinerja (studi PTS). Jurnal KDI, 15(2), 231–240.
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268
Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2018). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Bumi Aksara.
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. John Wiley & Sons.
Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2014). Organizational behavior (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). Communication: The process, barriers, and improving effectiveness. Schooling, 1(1), 1–11.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational behavior (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Mangkunegara, A. P. (2017). Manajemen sumber daya manusia perusahaan. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297704100112
Masduki, M. (2019). Peningkatan kinerja Perguruan Tinggi Swasta melalui penerapan knowledge management dan penguatan budaya organisasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 11(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.32670/coopetition.v10i2.47
Prabu. (2024). Pengaruh penghargaan terhadap motivasi kerja karyawan. Jurnal Sumber Daya Manusia, 4(1), 55–67.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson Education.
Sihombing, P. L. T. (2019). Strategi peningkatan kinerja karyawan dalam kasus perusahaan. Jurnal Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, 9(3), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.32493/JJSDM.v3i2.3899
Wu, C.-H., Kuo, P.-L., Yang, C.-H., Chang, Y.-C., & Chen, T.-L. (2023). Importance-performance analysis (IPA) in analyzing the satisfaction of administrative support in teaching practice research programs. Sustainability, 15, 1943. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031943
Irawan. (2023). Pengaruh motivasi dan penghargaan terhadap kinerja karyawan. Jurnal Manajemen Kinerja, 5(2), 112–124.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Business, Finance, and Economics (JBFE)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal Of Business, Finance, and Economics (JBFE) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.










