Politeness Principles In “Persuasion” Movie

Authors

  • Susi Anggraeni Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32585/ijelle.v3i1.1502

Keywords:

Politeness, Principle, Persuasion Movie

Abstract

The aims of this study is finding and describing politeness principle in Persuasion movie adopted from one of famous novels written by Jane Austen.  This research was a descriptive qualitative research. The data of this research were words, phrases and sentences on the dialogues uttered by the characters which generated politeness principle. The techniques of collecting data used in this research were documentation and content analysis. The procedure of the research obtained from collecting the data, giving code to each data, displaying the data and drawing the conclusion and the researcher used theory triangulation. The research found 23 data in Persuasion movie that consisted of: 1) tact maxim (6 or 26%), 2) approbiation maxim (4 or 17%), 3) generosity maxim (3 or 13%), 4) modesty maxim (3 or 13%), 5) agreement maxim (6 or 26%) and sympathy maxim (1 or 6%) which tact maxim and agreement maxim found as the dominant type of politeness principle in Persuasion movie. The conclusion of this research were: 1) there are six types of politeness principle which specifically discussed in this research and there were 23 data collected from those six types. 2) the researcher drawing the data into percentage to make it easier to saw which types of those six maxim were become the dominant type which founded. Factually, there are a lot of discussion dialogue which contains agree and disagreement and it requires the participants (speaker and listener) minimize cost and maximize benefit to other as the reason why Tact Maxim and Agreement Maxim become the most dominant type of politeness principle that are used in Persuasion movie.

References

Adi, S. S., Unsiah, F., & Lestari, R. N. (2019). Language Learning Strategies Used by Indonesian Vocational High School English Debate Group. International Journal of English Linguistics, Literature, and Education (IJELLE), 1(2), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.32585/ijelle.v1i2.536

Astuti, P. I., Giyatmi, G., Arumi, S., & Pratiwi, V. U. (2019). an Analysis of Quality Maxim in the Process of Thesis Guidance for English Education Department Students of Univet Bantara Sukoharjo. International Journal of English Linguistics, Literature, and Education (IJELLE), 1(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.32585/ijelle.v1i1.352

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1988). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4). In Cambridge University Press (Vol. 22, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.2307/3587263

Cruse, A. (2006). A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh University Press Ltd.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Language as social semiotic The social interpretation of language and meaning by Halliday M.A.K. (z-lib.org).pdf (pp. 1–132). Pitmann Press.

Leech, G. N. (1989). Principles of Pragmatics (Longman Linguistics Library) ( PDFDrive ).pdf.

Meiratnasari, A., Wijayanto, A., & Suparno, S. (2019). An analysis of Politeness Strategies in Indonesian English Textbooks. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 2(4), 529–540. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v2i4.8393

Najeh, L. (2015). Pragmatics: a Hybrid innovation. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926 Foucault , Power and Culture, 1(4), 401–419.

Rahardi, R. K. (2017). IJHS, e-ISSN 2597-4718, p-ISSN 2597-470X ,. 1(1), 84–92.

Ronchetti, M. (2010). Using video lectures to make teaching more interactive. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 5(2), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v5i2.1156

Simanullang, M. (2018). The effect of applying video on the Students’ English Pronunciation Accuracy at the Fifth Semester Students at the English Study Program of the Teacher’s Training and Education Faculty the University of Sisingamangaraja XII Tapanuli in Academic Year 2018/2019. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 3(6), 1000–1007. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.3.6.13

Sugiyono. (2017). prof. dr. sugiyono, metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan r&d. intro ( PDFDrive.com ).pdf.

Widayati, M. (2021). The Uses of Honorifics by President Candidate in The Campaign News Text on National Newspapers. International Journal of English Linguistics, Literature, and Education (IJELLE), 2(2), 116–130.

Wijayanto, T. (2014). A PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF POLITENESS STRATEGY IN THE COURSEBOOK: LOOK AHEAD 2 AN ENGLISH COURSE FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS YEAR XI. 09202244021.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatic. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-10

How to Cite

Anggraeni, S. (2021). Politeness Principles In “Persuasion” Movie. International Journal of English Linguistics, Literature, and Education (IJELLE), 3(1). https://doi.org/10.32585/ijelle.v3i1.1502

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Artikel

License

Authors who publish with the International Journal of English Linguistics, Literature, and Education (IJELLE) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.