Improving Learning Outcomes in Mathematics Using the Talking Stick Learning Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v4i2.2834Keywords:
Mathematics Learning Outcomes, Learning Model, Talking StickAbstract
Measurement-related math subject is taught in Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, but many students still struggle to understand the concepts making the subject becomes boring and unappealing. Low learning outcomes in mathematics might be caused by boredom with the subject and problems in comprehending. The Talking Stick learning model is implemented to help students who are struggling with mathematics. This study sought to determine whether the Talking Stick learning model may improve learning outcomes in mathematics. This experimental study used quantitative methodology. The participants were third-graders at MIN 9 Aceh Tengah. A formative test with multiple choice questions was used as the data collection tool. The test was administered to both the experimental and control classes in two stages, namely the pretest (beginning test) and post-test (final test). The t-test was the analytical method utilized. The data demonstrated that the Talking Stick learning approach might be used to enhance learning outcomes in mathematics.
References
Ardianto, Elvinaro. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Untuk Public Relations Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Arifin, Zainal. (2016). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Arroyo, I., Woolf, B.P., Burelson, W. et al. A Multimedia Adaptive Tutoring System for Mathematics that Addresses Cognition, Metacognition and Affect. Int J Artif Intell Educ 24, 387–426 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0023-y
Baines, E., Blatchford, P., & Chowne, A. (2007). “Improving The Effectiveness of Collaborative Group Work in Primary Schools: Effects on Science Attainment." British Educational Research Journal, 33(5), 663–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701582231
Bull R, Serif G. Executive functioning as a predictor of children's mathematics ability: inhibition, switching, and working memory. Dev Neuropsychol. 2001;19(3):273–93. doi: 10.1207/S15326942DN1903_3.
Carraher, T.N., Carraher, D.W. and Schliemann, A.D. (1985), Mathematics in the streets and in schools. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3: 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1985.tb00951.x
Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (2002). The transfer dilemma. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 1–24. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1466719
Chiriac, Hammar E. (2014). “Group Work As An Incentive For Learning: Students’ Experience of Group Work." Frontiers in Psychology, 5(Article), 558. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00558
Fattah, Nanang. (2013). Landasan Manajemen Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Geary, D. C., & Hoard, M. K. (2003). Learning disabilities in basic mathematics: Deficits in memory and cognition. In J. M. Royer (Ed.), Mathematical Cognition (p. 2003). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Gillies, R. (2016). “Cooperative Learning. Review of Research and Practice”. Australian Journal of Educational Research, pp. 41, 39–54.
Gillies, R. M., & Boyle, M. (2010). “Teachers’ Reflections on Cooperative Learning: Issues of Implementation." Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 933–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.034
Hamdayama, Jumanta. (2016). Metodologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible Learning. Routledge
Huda, Miftahul. (2014). Model-Model Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Isrok’atun dan Tiurlina. (2016). Model Pembelajaran Matematika Situation-Based Learning Di Sekolah Dasar. Sumedang: UPM Sumedang Press.
Johnson, D. W., R. T. Johnson, and K. A. Smith. (1998). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Kurniasih, Imas. (2015). Ragam Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Untuk Peningkatan Profesionalitas Guru. Jakarta: Kata Pena.
Kusnadi. (2018). Metode Pembelajaran Kolaboratif. Tasikmalaya: Edu Publisher.
Lemaire, P., & Lecacheur, M. (2011). Age-related changes in children's executive functions and strategy selection: a study in computational estimation. Cognitive Development, 26, 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2011.01.002
Lubis, Mayang Sari. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: CV Budi Utama.
Mazzocco, M. M., Feigenson, L., & Halberda, J. (2011). Preschoolers' precision of the approximate number system predicts later school mathematics performance. PloS one, 6(9), e23749. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023749
Peklaj, C., Vodopivec, B. (1999). “Effects of Cooperative Versus Individualistic Learning On Cognitive, Affective, Metacognitive And Social Processes In Students." Eur J Psychol Educ 14, 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173120
Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.). (2012). “Education For Life And Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge And Skills In The 21st Centrury”. American Educational Research Council.
Purwanto. (2014). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Reksoatmodjo, Tedjo N. (2007) Statistika Untuk Psikologi dan Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Royer, J. M. (Ed.). (2003). Mathematical Cognition. Greenwich: Infoage Publishing.
Rusman. (2012). Model-Model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Shoimin, Aris. (2014). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice, 2d ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Sriyanto. (2017). Mengobarkan Api Matematika. Sukabumi: CV Jejak.
Sukma, E., Marhadi, H., & Kurniaman, O. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Cooperatif Tipe Talking Stick Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Ips Siswa Kelas iii Sdn 009 Binio Jaya Kecamatan Kelayang Kabupaten Indragiri Hulu. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 3 (1).
Suprijono, Agus. (2010). Cooperative Learning Teori Dan Aplikasi PAIKEM. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Tronsky, L. N., & Royer, J. M. (2003). Relationships among basic computational automaticity, working memory, and complex mathematical problem solving: What we know and what we need to know. In J. M. Royer (Ed.), Mathematical cognition. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Van Aalst, J. (2013). “Assessment In Collaborative Learning." In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. M. O’Donnell (Eds.), The International Handbook Of Collaborative Learning. Routledge.
Widoyoko, Eko Putro. (2010). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Woolf, B., Arroyo, I., Muldner, K., Burleson, W., Cooper, D., Dolan, R., & Christopherson, R. (2010). The Effect of Motivational Learning Companions on Low Achieving Students and Students with Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS'10), pp. 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13388-6_37
Yamarik, S. (2007). “Does Cooperative Learning Improve Student Learning Outcomes?”. The Journal of Economic Education, 38(3), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.38.3.259-277
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Indonesian Journal of Instructional Media and Model agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
