Peer Review Process

Submitted manuscripts are first reviewed by the editor. It will be evaluated in the office, whether it is suitable for the focus and scope of Keraton Journal: Journal of History Education and Culture or has methodological weaknesses and a large similarity score using Ithenticate/ Plagiarism Checher X.
The manuscript will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers (Blind Peer Review). Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary action and response.
The recommended decisions will be evaluated at the editorial board meeting. After that, the editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author.