Analysis of The Characteristics of Teachers With High Internet Self-Efficacy Levels using The K-Means Algorithm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v4i1.2754Keywords:
K-Means, Teacher Characteristics, Online LearningAbstract
The purpose of this study was to see the readiness of teachers in conducting online learning. The characteristics of the teachers collected in this study were gender, generation, last education, teacher tenure, learning environment and variations of online learning models. This study uses the K-Means algorithm for clustering. The dataset used in this study were 96 junior high school teachers in Central Java who had a high level of internet self-efficacy. The dataset of teachers who have a high level of internet self-efficacy is obtained from the results of data analysis on 285 junior high school teachers, who have varying levels of internet self-efficacy, both high, medium and low. The results of the K-Means analysis obtained 8 clusters with various characteristics of each cluster. The data attributes analyzed were gender, generation, last education, teacher tenure, learning environment and variations of online learning models. The results showed that in all data clusters were dominated by female gender with a bachelor's educational background. Meanwhile, the relatively more dominant characters in all clusters are generation X data, teacher tenure between 11 and 20 years, a supportive learning environment, and data on the use of varied learning models.Downloads
References
Abadi, S., Mat The, K. S., Nasir, B. M., Huda, M., Ivanova, N. L., Sari, T. I., Maseleno, A., Satria, F., & Muslihudin, M. (2018). Application model of k-means clustering: Insights into promotion strategy of vocational high school. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(2.27 Special Issue 27), 182–187. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.11491
Aldino, A. A., & Darwis, D. (2018). The effect of mining data k-means clustering toward students profile model drop out potential The effect of mining data k-means clustering toward students profile model drop out potential.
Auliasari, K., & Kertaningtyas, M. (2019). Penerapan Algoritma K-Means untuk Segmentasi Konsumen Menggunakan R. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Manajemen Informatika, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.26905/jtmi.v5i2.3644
Brown, C., & Czerniewicz, L. (2010). Debunking the “digital native”: Beyond digital apartheid, towards digital democracy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00369.x
Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers ’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology.
Cassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2002). Developing the computer user self-efficacy (CUSE) scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://doi.org/10.2190/JGJR-0KVL-HRF7-GCNV
Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. In Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00110.x
Heinssen, R. K., Glass, C. R., & Knight, L. A. (1987). Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(87)90010-0
Hills, M. K. (2010). Digital natives and immigrants: The role of student attitudes towards technology on attrition and persistence in professional military education online distance learning environments. In ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
Hsu, M. H., & Chiu, C. M. (2004). Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision Support Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2003.08.001
Hung, M. L. (2016). Teacher readiness for online learning: Scale development and teacher perceptions. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.012
Hung, M. L., & Chou, C. (2015). Students’ perceptions of instructors’ roles in blended and online learning environments: A comparative study. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.022
Islam, H., & Haque, M. (2012). An Approach of Improving Student’s Academic Performance by using K-means clustering algorithm and Decision tree. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 3(8), 146–149. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2012.030824
Jaber, W., & Moore, D. (1999). A Survey of Factors Which Influence Teachers’ Use of Computer-Based Technology. International Journal of Instructional Media, 26(3), 253–266.
Jones, C., & Czerniewicz, L. (2010). Describing or debunking? The net generation and digital natives. In Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00379.x
Joo, Y. J., Bong, M., & Choi, H. J. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02313398
Jr, R. G. M. (2011). Adapting Teaching to the Millennial Generation : A Case Study of a Blended / Hybrid Course.
Kim, Y., & Glassman, M. (2013). Beyond search and communication: Development and validation of the Internet Self-efficacy Scale (ISS). Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.018
McCool, M., Robison, A. D., & Reinders, J. (2012). K-Means Clustering. In Structured Parallel Programming. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-415993-8.00011-6
Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2009). Learning with computer-based learning environments: A literature review of computer self-efficacy. In Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326083
Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390000200096
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Sam, H. K., Othman, A. E. A., & Nordin, Z. S. (2005). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, and attitudes toward the Internet: A study among undergraduates in Unimas. Educational Technology and Society.
Santosa, E. B., & Sarwanta, S. (2021). Pengaruh Tingkat Internet Self-Efficacy, Pengalaman Mengajar dan Usia Guru Terhadap Peguasaan Komputer dalam Strategi Pembelajaran Daring. Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama, 8(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v8i1.1489
Wahlstrom, K. L., & Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321502
Wang, Q., Myers, M. D., & Sundaram, D. (2013). Digital natives and digital immigrants: Towards a model of digital fluency. Business and Information Systems Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-013-0296-y
Wang, S. L., & Lin, S. S. J. (2007). The effects of group composition of self-efficacy and collective efficacy on computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.005
Yeşilyurt, E., Ulaş, A. H., & Akan, D. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy, academic self-efficacy, and computer self-efficacy as predictors of attitude toward applying computer-supported education. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.038
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Indonesian Journal of Instructional Media and Model agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.