A Comparative Analysis of Biology Learning Outcomes of Grade 10 Students Using Independent Questions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32585/jbl.v8i1.7870Keywords:
Learning outcomes, Biology, t-testAbstract
This study aims to compare the biology learning outcomes of students in classes X E4 and X E5 at SMA Veteran 1 Sukoharjo. Sukoharjo (a senior high school). The study used a descriptive quantitative method with an instrument in the form of a multiple-choice biology test consisting of 10 questions. The research sample involved all students in classes X E4 and X E5 in the 2025/2026 academic year, with a total of 76 respondents. Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted to obtain an initial overview of the students' Biology test results, while the prerequisite analysis tests included normality and homogeneity of variance tests. The normality test results showed that the student learning outcome data in both classes were normally distributed, and the homogeneity test results showed that the data variance was homogeneous, thus fulfilling the requirements for an independent two-sample t-test. The t-test results showed a significance value of Sig. (2-tailed) of 0.530 (> 0.05), indicating that there was no significant difference between the biology learning outcomes of students in classes X E4 and X E5 at SMA Veteran 1 Sukoharjo
Downloads
References
Adrianti, M., Jamaluddin, J., & Bahri, S. (2022). Penerapan model pembelajaran think, talk, write (TTW) dan survey, question, read, reflect, recite, review (SQ4R) pada pelajaran biologi kelas X SMAN 9 Mataram. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 7(3), 1157–1166. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v7i3.703
Ahadi, G. D., & Zain, N. N. L. E. (2023). Pemeriksaan uji kenormalan dengan Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Anderson-Darling dan Shapiro-Wilk. Eigen Mathematics Journal, 6(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.29303/emj.v6i1.131
Amelia, E., Attalina, C., Nichla, S., & Widiyono, A. (2022). Pengaruh model kooperatif tipe STAD berbantuan media manipulatif terhadap hasil belajar siswa di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling, 4(3), 542–548.
Arikunto, S. (2021). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (Edisi 3). Bumi Aksara.
Arisandy, D. A., Fitriani, L., & Ghassani, F. (2018). Efektivitas model pembelajaran inquiry terhadap hasil pembelajaran biologi siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 6 Lubuklinggau. Bioedusains: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi dan Sains, 1(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.31539/bioedusains.v1i1.267
Balai Riset Budidaya Laut dan Penyuluhan Perikanan. (n.d.). Uji homogenitas tepung ikan pada sampel uji banding antar laboratorium. Buletin Teknik Litkayasa Akuakultur, 18(2), 139–143.
Dimyati, & Mudjiono. (2006). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Rineka Cipta.
Dwi Puspita Sari, D. (n.d.). Pengaruh model pembelajaran project-based learning (PjBL) terhadap hasil belajar kognitif siswa kelas X pada mata pelajaran biologi di SMA Negeri 7 Seluma. https://doi.org/10.33373/sim-bio.v13i2.6968
Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications.
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 23.
Indah, R. A., & Fadilah, M. (2024). Literature review: Pengaruh media pembelajaran literasi visual terhadap hasil belajar biologi siswa SMA. Biodik, 10(2), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.22437/biodik.v10i2.33803
Jaharudin, Fathurrahman, & Putri. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis masalah dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa kelas X SMA Labschool STKIP Pulau Arar. Jurnal Pendidikan, 8(1).
Kusumasari, S. E., & Saifuddin, M. F. (2020). Implementasi model pembelajaran TAI terhadap oral activities dan hasil belajar kognitif C1–C4 materi ekskresi. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(2), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.17977/um052v11i2p40-48
Learning, B., & Vs, S. (2025). Blended learning (synchronous vs asynchronous).
Martina, Y., & Ramdani, A. (2024). Perbedaan hasil belajar biologi siswa menggunakan media video pembelajaran berbasis Sparkol Videoscribe dengan media PowerPoint. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.7712
Munandar, R. A. (2016). Pengaruh pembelajaran mind map terhadap hasil belajar biologi siswa kelas X di SMAN Kebakkramat (Skripsi). Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Musyaropah, R. M. (2023). Perbandingan hasil belajar biologi konsep dunia tumbuhan yang diajar dengan model problem solving dan problem posing berbasis daring. EduTeach, 4(2).
Nasar, A., Saputra, D. H., Arkaan, M. R., Ferlyando, M. B., Andriansyah, M. T., & Pangestu, P. D. (2024). Uji prasyarat analisis. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 2(6), 786–799.
Maramis, N. G., Ngangi, J., & Tengker, A. C. C. (2025). Peningkatan hasil belajar biologi melalui model group investigation di kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Tutuyan. Pentagon, 3(2), 164–179. https://doi.org/10.62383/pentagon.v3i2.587
Nurhaswinda, N., Zulkifli, A., Gusniati, J., Zulefni, M. S., Afendi, R. A., Asni, W., & Fitriani, Y. (2025). Tutorial uji normalitas dan uji homogenitas dengan menggunakan aplikasi SPSS. Jurnal Cahaya Nusantara, 1(2), 55–68.
Nurkhalimah, A. I., & Andriani, A. E. (2025). Development of interactive multimedia based on articulate storyline for force material to improve learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(2), 907–926. https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.9.2.p.907-926
Pasapan, D., Tumbel, F. M., & Taulu, M. L. S. (2025). Hubungan antara motivasi belajar, lingkungan belajar, dan hasil belajar. 4(3), 3694–3705.
Priyatno, D. (2017). Panduan praktis olah data menggunakan SPSS. Andi.
Putri, N., Putri, R. S., Fauziah, C. W., Nusantari, D. O., & Zulkarnain, I. (2025). Analisis komparatif berbasis statistik untuk mengevaluasi penerapan metode pembelajaran ditinjau dari hasil belajar siswa. Himpunan, 5(2), 195–202.
Rizki, R. M., Pranata, O. D., & Angela, L. (2024). Analisis konsentrasi siswa dalam pembelajaran biologi: Studi deskriptif dan komparatif. Oryza, 13(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.33627/oz.v13i1.1806
Santoso, S. (2010). Statistik multivariat. Elex Media Komputindo.
Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Rineka Cipta.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D.
Tatsbita Rusyda, M., Zulkifli, L., & Merta, W. (2024). Perbandingan hasil belajar siswa melalui penggunaan model discovery learning dengan model kooperatif tipe snowball throwing. https://doi.org/10.29303/geoscienceed.v5i4.514
Uno, H. B., & Lamatenggo, N. (2016). Landasan pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.
Vorapongsathorn, T., Taejaroenkul, S., & Viwatwongkasem, C. (2004). A comparison of type I error and power of Bartlett’s test, Levene’s test and Cochran’s test under violation of assumptions. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 26(4), 537–547.
Yamin, S., & Kurniawan, H. (2009). SPSS complete. Salemba Infotek.
Yunianto, I. Y. (2010). Pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD menggunakan lab riil dan virtual (Skripsi). Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Zulkifli, A., Gusniati, J., Zulefni, M. S., Afendi, R. A., Asni, W., & Fitriani, Y. (2025). Tutorial uji normalitas dan uji homogenitas dengan menggunakan aplikasi SPSS.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alya Febrina Azzahra, Hanafi Reviana , Yastin Indriawati , Muncar Sundari , Suwarto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal of Biology Learning agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

