Karakteristik Tes Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32585/jp.v31i1.2269Abstract
Tujuan penelitian, memaparkan: karakteristik tes IPA berdasarkan teori tes klasik dan teori tes modern. Desain penelitian adalah kuantitatif dan deskriptif. Objek penelitian adalah tes prestasi IPA selama Covid-19, guru IPA, kepala sekolah, dan wakil kepala sekolah. Data diperoleh dari tanggapan siswa sejumlah 280 terhadap seluruh lembar jawaban siswa kelas VIII SMP MTA Gemolong Sragen sebagai populasi penelitian ini. Kunci jawaban soal IPA dan satu paket soal IPA (50 butir pilihan ganda) diperoleh dari guru IPA. Teknik penelitian dengan wawancara dan dokumenter. Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan program Quest. Hasil penelitian: (1). Karakteristik tes IPA berdasarkan teori tes klasik: Validitas isi tidak terpenuhi, reliabilitas tes 0.960, kategori tingkat kesulitan butir dalam persentase adalah mudah: sedang: sulit = 10%:84%:6%, kategori daya beda buitir dalam persentase adalah jelek: cukup: baik: sangat baik = 2%: 4%: 14%: 80%, jadi dominan sangat baik, sedangkan keberfungsian pengkecoh dalam persentase adalah tidak efekti: efektif = 0,70%: 99,30%, jadi dominan pengkecoh yang efektif. (2). Karaketristik tes IPA berdasarkan teori tes modern: kategori Threshold tes IPA dalam persentase adalah sangat sulit: sulit: sedang: mudah: sangat mudah = 0%:12%:78%:10%:0%, jadi Threshold tes IPA dominan sedang. Persentase kecocokan butir tes IPA dengan Racsh Model adalah 88%.
Kata-kata Kunci: Karakteristik Tes.
Downloads
Author Biography
Prof. Dr. Suwarto, M.Pd, Universitas Veteran Bangun Nusantara Sukoharjo
References
Adams, R. J. & Khoo, S. T. (1996). Quest the Interactive Test Analysis System. Australia: The Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd.
Allen, M. J. & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introductioon to Measurement Theory. Monterey: Brooks Cole Publishing Company.
Anderson, O. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Anggreyani, A. (2009). Penerapan Teori Uji Klasik dan Teori Respon Butir dalam Mengevaluasi Butir Soal. Departemen Statistika Fakultas Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Arikunto, S. (2004). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Bimbaum, A. (1968). Some Latent Trait Models and Their Use in Inferring an Examinee's Ability. In F. M. Lord and M. R. Novick, Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (Chapters 17-20). Reading, M. A: Addison-Wesley.
Boopathiraj, C. & Chellamani, K. (2013). Analysis of Test Items on Difficulty Level and Discrimination Index in The Test pfor Research in Education. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research 2(2), 189-193. Retrieved from: indianresearchjournals.com.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principle and Classroom Practice. United States of America: Pearson Education.
Cheng, Y., Yang, Y. & Du, D. (2019). A class of asymptotically optimal group testing strategies to identify good items . Discrete Applied Mathematics Journal. 260, 109–116.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. New York: CBS College.
Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (1981). Materi Dasar Pendidikan Program Akta Mengajar V. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Perguruan Tinggi.
Dichoso, A. A. & Joy M. R. J. (2020). Test Item Analyzer using Point-Biserial Correlation and P-Values. International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(4). 2122-2126
Djemari, M. (2004). Penyususunan Tes Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Ebel, R. L. (1986). Essential of Educational Measurement. United Stated of America: Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Elfrianto, Dahnial, I., & Tanjung, B. N. (2020). The Competency Analysis of Principal Against Teachers in Conducting Distance Learning in Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Tarbiyah, 27(1), 156-171.
Etsey, Y. K., “Assessing performance in schools: Issues and practice,” Ife Psychologia, vol. 13, no. 1, 123-135, 2004.
Fathoni, A. (2006). Metodelogi Penelitian dan Teknik Penyusunan Skripsi. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Fernandez. H. J. X. (1984). Testing and Measurement. Jakarta: National Education Planning Evaluation and Curriculum Development.
Frostb, K. & Liuc, B. (2020). Teachers’ involvement in high-stakes language assessment reforms: The case of Test for English Majors (TEM) in China Jason Fana. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 66, 1-10.
Hambleton, R. K. (1989). Principles and Selected Applications of Item Response Theory. In R. L. Linn (Ed.). Educational Measurement (3rd ed.) (pp. 147-200). New York: Macmillan.
Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H.J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. London: Sage Publication.
Hamimi, L., Zamharirah, R. & Rusydy. (2020). Analisis Butir Soal Ujian Matematika Kelas VII Semester Ganjil Tahun Pelajaran 2017/2018. Mathema Journal. 2(1). 57-66.
Harrys & Valette. (2003). Principles Language Testing I. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Haryudin, A. (2015). Validity and Reliability of English Summative Tests at Junior High School in West Bandung. Jurnal Ilmiah UPT P2M STKIP Siliwangi, 2(1), 77-90.
Hidayati, A. D. (2009). The Analysis of Validity, Reliability, Discrimination Power and Level of Difficulty of First Mid-Term Test in The Case of The Eighth Grade Students of SMP 33 Semarang. A final project: Semarang State University.
Huda, N. & Wahyuni, T. S. (2019). Analisis Butir Soal IPA Try Out USBN Tahun Ajaran 2018/2019 dalam Kaitannya dengan Level Kognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Dasar. 12(1), 29-39.
Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for Language Teacher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jandaghi, G. (2011). Assessment of Validity, Reliability and Difficulty Indices for Teacher-built Physics Exam Questions in First Year High School. Arts and Social Sciences Journal. ASSJ-16. E-ISSN: 21516200. Retrived from: http://astonjournals.com/assj.
Jayanti, D., Husna, N. & Hidayat, D. N. (2019). The Validity and Reliability Analysis of English National Final Examination for Junior High School. Voices of English Language Education Society, 3(2), 127 -135.
Kartowagiran, B. (2009). Pengantar Teori Tes Klasik (TTK). Makalah Pascasarjana UNY dan DIinas Pendidikan Prov DIY.
Keppel, G. (1976). Design and Analysis a Researcher's Handbook (2rd). Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Kheyami, D., Jaradat, A., Al-Shibani, T., & Ali, F. A. (2018). Item Analysis of Multiple-Choice Questions at the Department of Paediatrics, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain. Sultan Qaboos Univesity Medical Journal, 18(1), 68-74.
Kolte, V. (2015). Item Analysis of Multiple Choice Questions in Physiology Examination. Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research, 4(4), 320-326.
Kunandar, K. (2013). Penilaian Autentik: Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Kurikulum 2013. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Lababa, D. (2008). Analisis Butir Soal dengan Teori Tes Klasik. IQRA’ Journal,5, 29-37.
Lai, E. R. (2011). Motivation: A Literature Review. Research Report. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonassessments.com/research.
Lailamsyah, A. F. & Aproyanti, F. (2020). An Item Analysis of English Summative Test for the Tenth Grade Students of SMA Muhammadiyah 3 Jakarta In The 2013/2014 Academic Year. Education Humanistic Journal, 5(1). 610-615.
Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Madsen, H., S. (1983). Techniques in Testing. Oxford University Press.
Maharani, A. V. & Putro, N. H. P. S. (2020). Item Analysis of English Final Semester Test. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics. 5(2), 2020. 492-504.
Mahirah, R., Ahmad, D. & Sukirman. (2016). Designing Multiple Choice Test of Vocabulary for the First Semester Students at English Education Department of Alauddin State Islamic University of Makassar. English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal, 2(2), 194-208.
Manalu, D. (2019). An Analysis of Students Reading Final Examination by Using Item Analysis Program on Eleventh Grade of SMA Negeri 8 Medan. Journal of English Teaching & Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 13-19.
Mardapi, D. (2004). Penyusunan Test Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Masruroh, H. Z. (2014). An Item Analysis on English Summative Test for Second Grade Students of MAN Tulungagung 1 in Academic Year 2013/2014. A Thesis: State Islamic Institute Tulungagung.
Muhson, Lestari, Supriyanto & Baroroh (2016). The Development of Practical Item Analysis Program for Indonesian Teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 199-210.
Mulianah, S. & Hidayat, W. (2013). Pengembangan Tes Berbasis Komputer. Kuriositas, 2(6), 27- 43.
Nugiyantoro, B., Gunawan, Marzuki. (2002). Statistik Terapan Untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Panadero E. (2017). A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research. Frontiers in Psychol, 8(422), 1-28.
Pascual, G. R. (2016). Analysis of The English Achievement Test for ESL Learners in Northern Philippines. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 5(12),1-5. retrieved from www.garph.co.uk.
Pradanti, S. I., Martono, M., & Sarosa, T. (2018). An Item Analysis of English Summative Test for The First Semester of The Third Grade Junior High School Students in Surakarta. English Education, 6(3), 312–318.
Purwanto. (2016). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Putri, B. D. T. (2017). the Validity Analysis of English Summative Test of Junior High School. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching. 5(1), 6-11.
Raharja, N. S. (2014). Analisis Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Sekolah Produktif Pemasaran Kelas Xii Pemasaran SMK Negeri 9 Semarang. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 3(3), 564-569. Retrieved from http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eeaj.
Rehman, A., Aslam, A. & Hassan, S. H. (2018). Item Analysis of Multiple-Choice Questions. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal, 38(2), 291-293.
Richard & Sheila. (1999). Item Analysis for Criterion-Referenced Tests. New York: Research Foundation of SUNY/Center for Development of Human Services.
Riduwan. (2007). Belajar Mudah Penelitian untuk Guru, Karyawan dan Peneliti Pemula. Akdon. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Roid, G. H. & Haladyna, T. M. (1982). A Technology for Test-Item Writing. London: Academic Press, Inc.
Roszkowski, M. J., & Spreat, S. (2011). Issues to consider when evaluating “tests”. In Financial planning and counseling scales, 13-31. Springer New York.
Rudyatmi, Ely & Rusllowati, A. (2017). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Semarang: Faculty of Mathematics and Science Unnes.
Rusmiana, F.D. (2015). The Test Item Analysis of 1st Semester Final Test of The Accounting Theory for Vocational Education: Case Study of SMK YPKK 1 Sleman Academic Year of 2014/2015. A Thesis: Yogyakarta State University.
Sa’adah, N. (2017). The Analysis of English Mid-Term Test Items based on the Criteria of a Good Test at the First Semester of the Eighth Grade Students Of Mts. Mathalibul Huda Mlonggo In The Academic Year Of 2016/2017. Journal Edulingua, 4(1),45-58.
Salwa, A. (2012). The Validity, Reliability, Level of Difficulty, and Appropriateness of Curriculum of the English Test. A Thesis: Postgraduate Program of Linguistics Diponegoro University Semarang
Santoso, A., Kartianom, K. & Kassymova, G. K. (2019). Kualitas butir bank soal statistika. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 165-176.
Saputra, A. N. S., Retnawati, H. & Yusron, E. (2021). Analysis Difficulties and Characteristics of Item Test of on Biology National Standard School Examination. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 542, 8-14.
Satori, D. & Komariah, A. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : Penerbit Alfabeta.
Shaban, A. S. (n.d). A comparison between Objective and subjective tests. A paper.
Shomami, A. (2014). An Item Analysis of English Summative Test. A Thesis: Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University.
Singh, J. P., Kariwal P., Gupta S.B., & Shrotriya V.P. (2014). Improving Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) through item analysis: An assessment of the assessment tool. International Journal of Sciences & Applied Research, 1(2), 53-57. Retrived from: www.ijsar.in.
Subali, B. & Suyata, P. (2011). Panduan Analisis Data Pengukuran Pendidikan Untuk Memperoleh Bukti Empirik Kesahihann Menggunakan Program Quest. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta: Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masayarakat.
Sudijono, A. (2015). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sugianto, A. (2017). Validity and Reliability of English Summative Test for Senior High School. Indonesian EFL Journal: Journal of ELT, Linguistics, and Literature, 3(2), 22-38. P-ISSN: 2460-0938. E-ISSN: 2460-2604.
Sugianto, A. (2020). Item Analysis of English Summative Test: EFL Teacher-Made Test. Indonesian EFL Research & Practice, 1(1), 35-54.
Sugiarti, N. (2019). The Characteristics of the English Multiple Choice Test Items in the Year-End Assessment of Grade 8 Students of SMPN 8 Yogyakarta in the Academic Year of 2017/2018. Thesis: Postgraduate Program Yogyakarta State University.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Suhr, D. (2003). Reliability, Exploratory & Confirmatory Factor Analysis for the Scale of Athletic Priorities. Statistic and Data Analysis, 274(28), 1-7.
Sultana, N. (2018). Test Review of the English Public Examination at the Secondary Level in Bangladesh. Language Testing in Asia, 8(16), 1-9.
Sunardi, D., Irdiyansyah, I. (2019). Constructing Distractors of Multiple-Choice: Students’ Obstacles Analysis. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 511. 166-168.
Surapranata, S. (2004). Analisis, Validitas, Reliabilitas dan Interpretasi Hasil Test. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Suruchi & Rana S. S. (2014). Test Item Analysis and Relationship Between Difficulty Level and Discrimination Index of Test Items in an Achievement Test in Biology. Indian Journal of Research, 3(6), 56-58.
Suryabrata, S. (1982). Psikologi Belajar: Materi Dasar Pendidikan Program Bimbingan dan Konseling di Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta: Ditjen Pendidikan Tinggi.
Suryabrata, S. (2005). Pengembangan Alat Ukur Psikologis. Yogyakarta: C.V Andi Offset.
Suwarto. (2004). Analisis Item dalam Pembuatan Tes. Jurnal pendidikan, 13(3), 299-300.
Suwarto. (2007). Tingkat Kesulitan, Daya Beda, dan Reliabilitas Tes Menurut Teori Tes Klasik. Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(2), 166-178.
Suwarto. (2010). Penelitian Pendidikan. Sukoharjo: Ziyaad
Suwarto. (2013). Difficulty, Difference, and Reliability Level of New Student Selection Test for Veteran Bangun Nusantara Sukoharjo University. National Seminar on Science Education. 652- 658.
Suwarto. (2013). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Dalam Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Suwarto. (2016). The Biology Test Characteristic of 7th Grade by The Period of The Odd Term. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora. 17(1), 1-8.
Suwarto. (2018). Statistik Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Suwarto. (2021). The Characteristics of Indonesia a Second- Semester Final Test for Eight-grade Students. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry. 12(9), 356-370.
Toksöz, S. & Ertunç., A. (2017). Item Analysis of a Multiple-Choice Exam. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(6), 141-146.
Wainer, H. & Braun, H. I. (1988). Test Validity. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Webb, C.L., Kohler, K.L., & Piper, R.E. (2021). Teachers’ preparedness and professional learning about using educational technologies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Online Learning Research, 7(2), 113-132.
Yahaya, A., Yahaya. N., Boon, Y., Hashim, S., Lee, G. M. (2012). The Impact of Emotional Intelligence Element on Academic Achievement. Archives Des Sciences, 65(4). 2-17.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright to this article is transferred to Jurnal Pendidikan if and when the article is accepted for publication under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to Jurnal Pendidikan. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
1. This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
2. It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above-mentioned paper in whole to Jurnal Pendidikan. The copyright transfer covers the right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online), or any other reproductions of similar nature. The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
1. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the work.
2. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the work or derivative works for the author’s personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the Jurnal Pendidikan copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies Jurnal Pendidikan endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
3. Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
Jurnal Pendidikan by http://journal.univetbantara.ac.id/index.php/jp is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
