Effect of The Addition of Casava Peel and Lactid Acid Bacteria As Feed Additives on The Chemical Profile of Broiler Chicken Meat

Authors

  • Arindya Ayu Perwitarini Universitas Diponegoro
  • Edjeng Suprijatna Universitas Diponegoro
  • Rina Muryani Universitas Diponegoro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32585/bjas.v1i2.394

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the effect of feed additives in the form of a combination of cassava peel and BAL on the chemical profile of broiler chicken meat in the form of protein, cholesterol, LDL and HDL broiler chicken meat. The material used was 144 broiler day old chicken (DOC), feed (containing 18.9% protein; 7.3% fat; 7.5% crude fiber; calcium 0.8%; Phosphorus 0.7%; energy metabolic (3044.9 kcal). This research used a completely randomized design with 4 treatments and 6 replications. T0 is a basal ration without the addition of feed additives (control); T1 is a basal ration + 50 ml / kg of feed additive; T2 is a basal ration + 100 ml / kg of feed additives and T3 is a basal ration + 150 ml / kg of feed additives. The results of the analysis of variance showed that the treatment of cassava peel and lactic acid bacteria affected the levels of meat protein and meat cholesterol but did not affect the levels of Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) and High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) (P <0.05). Meat protein levels T0, T1, T2 and T3 respectively were 18.42%; 18.35%; 18.46% and 17.13%. Cholesterol levels of meat T0, T1, T2 and T3 were 1.49 mg / g; 1.43 mg / g; 1.08 mg / g and 1.05 mg / g. LDL levels of meat T0, T1, T2 and T3 were 0.32 mg / g; 0.35 mg / g; 0.37 mg / g and 0.37 mg / g. HDL levels of meat T0, T1, T2 and T3 were 0.18 mg / g; 0.16 mg / g; 0.15 mg / g and 0.19 mg / g. This study can be concluded that the addition of cassava peel can improve protein levels and reduce cholesterol levels but have not been able to improve LDL and HDL levels of broiler chicken meat.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdurrahman, Z. H. dan Y. Yanti. 2018. Gambaran umum pengaruh probiotik dan prebiotik pada kualitas daging ayam. J. Ternak Tropika. (19) 2 : 95 – 104.

Akhadiarto, S. 2010. Pengaruh pemanfaatan limbah kulit singkong dalam pembuatan pellet ransum unggas. J. Teknologi Lingkungan. 11 (1) : 127 – 138.

Astuti, F. K., W. Busono dan O. Sjofjan. 2015. Pengaruh penambahan probiotik cair dalam pakan terhadap penampilan produksi pada ayam pedaging. J. PAL. 6 (2) : 99 – 104.

Daud, M. 2006. Persentase dan kualitas karkas ayam pedaging yang diberi probitoik dan prebiotik dalam ransum. J. Ilmu Ternak. 2 (6) : 126 – 131.

Gabriela, C. R. R., I. M. Pop dan D. Simean. 2005. Effect of a symbiotic feed additive supplementation on laying hens performance and eggs quality. Br. Poult. Sci. 53: 89 – 93.

Haryati, T. 2011. Probiotik dan prebiotik sebagai pakan imbuhan non ruminansia. Wartazoa. 21 (3) : 125 – 132.

Ibrahim, W., R. Mutia dan Nurhayati. 2015. Penggunaan kulit nanas fermentasi dalam ransum yang mengandung gulma berkhasiat obat terhadap lemak dan kolesterol ayam broiler. J. Agripet. (14) 1 : 20 – 27.

Iriyanti, N. dan E. A. Rimbawanto. 2001. Inokulasi probiotik lactobacillus sp. Asal ayam buras sebagai upaya perbaikan performans ayam petelur.Laporan Penelitian.Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Jenderal Soedirman. Purwokerto.

Kartikasari, L. R., Soeparno dan Setiyono. 2001. Komposisi kimia dan studi asam lemak daging dada ayam broiler yang mendapat suplementasimetionin pada pakan berkadar protein rendah. Buletin Peternakan. 25(1) : 33 – 39.

Massolo, R., A. Mujnisa dan L. Agustina. 2009. Persentase karkas dan lemak abdominal broiler yang diberi prebiotik inulin umbi bunga Dahlia (Dahlia variabillis). Buletin Nutrisi dan Makanan Ternak. 12(2) : 50 – 58.

Nuningtyas, Y. F. 2014. Pengaruh penambahan tepung bawang putih (Allium sativum) sebagai aditif terhadap penampilan produksi ayam pedaging. J. Ternak Tropika. 1(15) : 21 – 30.

Poendjiadi, A. 2005. Dasar-dasar Biokimia. UI Press. Jakarta.

Rasyaf, M. 2003. Makanan Ayam Broiler. Kanisius, Yogyakarta.

Siswohardjono, W. 1982. Beberapa Metode Pengukuran Energi Metabolis Bahan Makanan pada Itik. Makalah Seminar Fakultas Pascasarjana. Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.

Sukarini, N. E., L. D. Mahfudz dan A. M. Legowo. 2004. Pengaruh penggunaan ampas kecap yang diproses dengan larutan asam asetat untuk pakan terhadap komposisi kimia daging dada ayam broiler (The usage effect of acetic acid-processed soy souce waste in a ration to chemical composition of broiler breast). J. Indon. Trop. Anim. Agric. 29 (3) : 129 - 138.

Suthama, N. 2003. Metabolisme protein pada ayam kampung periode pertumbuhan yang diberi ransum memakai dedak padi fermentasi. J. Pengemb. Pet. Trop. 1(1) : 44 – 48.

Syafrizal, Nurliana dan Sugito. 2018. Pengaruh pemberian ampas kedelai dan bungkil inti sawit (AKBIS) yang difermentasi dengan Aspergillus niger terhadap kadar lemak dan kolesterol daging dada broiler. J. Agripet. 18(2) 74 – 82.

Tamalludin, F. 2014. Ayam Broiler. Penebar Swadaya, Yogyakarta.

Tanewo, M., A. Paga dan B. Hadisusanto. 2010. Status hematologis broiler yang diberikan tepung sangria biji asam tanpa kulit. J. Kajian Veteriner. 1 (3) : 43 – 51.

Downloads

Published

2019-10-30

How to Cite

Perwitarini, A. A., Suprijatna, E., & Muryani, R. (2019). Effect of The Addition of Casava Peel and Lactid Acid Bacteria As Feed Additives on The Chemical Profile of Broiler Chicken Meat. Bantara Journal of Animal Science, 1(2), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.32585/bjas.v1i2.394

Issue

Section

Artikel