Kefektifan Bahan Ajar Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Model Learning Cycle 7e Untuk Kelas V
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32585/jdb.v1i2.136Abstract
Proses pembelajaran dalam KTSP memerlukan pengembangan bahan ajar. Observasi yang peneliti lakukan di kelas V pada lima sekolah dasar, 80% guru tidak membuat bahan ajar sendiri, 60% SD masih menggunakan bahan ajar teacher center, dan 50% belum mengembangkan bahan ajar active learning. Penelitian ini menggunakan model pengembangan Plomp dengan tujuan untuk memperoleh bahan ajar yang efektif. Subjek uji coba adalah siswa kelas V SD Negeri Grujugan sebagai kelas eskperimen, dan SD Negeri Kritig sebagai kelas kontrol. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah uji beda dua rata-rata dan uji N-gain. Hasil Penelitian menunjukan implementasi bahan ajar terbukti efektif karena setelah diberi perlakuan menggunakan model learning cycle 7E terdapat perbedaan antara kelas kontrol dan ekperimen dengan nilai signifikansi 0,02 < 0,05 dan peningkatan hasil N-gain kelas eksperimen sebesar 0,62 yang menunjukan kriteria sedang. Simpulan yang diperoleh dari penelitian ini adalah pengembangan bahan ajar IPA model learning cycle 7E adalah efektif.
Kata Kunci: Keefektifan, learning cycle 7E, Bahan Ajar IPA
Downloads
References
Arikunto, S. 2012. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Brookfield, S. D. 2012. Teaching For Critical Thinking. Amerika: Jossey-Bass.
Cardak O, Dikmenli M, & Saritas O. 2013. Effect Of 5e Instructional Model In Student Success In Primary School 6 Th Year Circulatory System Topic. Journal Asia Pasific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(13).
Che, S. F. 2002. Teaching Critical Thinking Skills in a Hong Kong Secondary School. Journal Asia Pasific Education Review. 3(1).
Ergin I, Kanli U, Yasin U. 2008. An Example for Effect of 5E Model on the Academic Success and Attitude Levels of Student:”Inclined Projectile Motion”. Journal of Turkish Science Education.5 (3).
Hamdani, M.A. 2010. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Pustaka setia.
Hanuscin, D. L. & Lee, M.H. 2008. Using the Learning Cycle as a Model for Teaching the Learning cycle to Preservice Elementary Teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20 (2).
Indriyani, I.R. 2013. Pengembangan LKS Fisika Berbasis Siklus Belajar (Learning Cycle) 7E untuk meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis pada Siswa SMA Kelas X Pokok Bahasan Elektromagnetik. FIP Pascasarjana Universitas Ahmad Dahlan. Yogyakarta.
Jufri, A W. 2013. Belajar dan Pembelajaran SAINS. Bandung: Pustaka Reka Cipta.
Marek, E.A. 2008. Why the Learning cycle. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20 (3).
Marek E.A, Maier S.J, & Micam F. 2008. Assesing Understanding of the Learning Cycle: The ULC. Journal Science Teacher Education, 19 (375-389).
Meltzer, D.E. 2002. The Relationship between mathemathic preparation and conceptual learning gain in physics: a possible “hidden variabel” in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal Physics. Vol. 12. No. 70.
Ngalimun. 2014. Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran . Yogyakarta: Aswaja Presindo.
Qarareh, A.O. 2012. The Effect of Using the Learning Cycle Method in Teaching Science on the Educational Achievement of the Sixth Graders. International Journal of Science Education. 4 (123-132).
Putra, S.R. 2013. Desain Belajar Mengajar Kreatif Berbasis Sains. Jakarta Diva Press.
Plomp, T & Nieveen, N. 2007. An Introduction to Educational Design Research. Netherland: Netzodruk,enschede.
Rusman. 2012. Model-model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Raja Grapindo Perada.
Sani, R.A. 2013. Inovasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sanjaya, W. 2006. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta : Kencana.
Snyder, M. J & Snyder, L. G. 2008. Teaching Critical Thinking and Problem solving Skill. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal. 1 (2).
Schneider, V. 2002. Critical Thinking in the Elementary Classroom: Problem and Solutions. Educator Publising Service. EPS book.
Sudijono, A. 2006. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sugiantara, Pt., Kusmariyatni, Nym., & Marguyasa. 2013. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas V di gugus VII Kecamatan Buleleng. PGSD FIP. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Singaraja Indonesia.
Sugiyono. 2010. Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Trianto. 2009. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.
Waswa, P & Felicia, O. 2013.Enhancing Student’ Achievement in Chemistry through the Piagentian Model The Learning Cycle. Journal for Cross-Discipilinary Subject in Education (IJCDSE), 4 (4).
Wena, M. 2014. Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif kontemporer Suatu Tinjauan Konseptual Operasional. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright to this article is transferred to Jurnal Dikdas Bantara if and when the article is accepted for publication under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to Jurnal Dikdas Bantara. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.We declare that:
1. This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
2. It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above-mentioned paper in whole to Jurnal Dikdas Bantara. The copyright transfer covers the right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online), or any other reproductions of similar nature. The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
1. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the work.
2. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the work or derivative works for the author’s personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the Jurnal Dikdas Bantara copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies Jurnal Dikdas Bantara endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
3. Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
