Analysis Forms of Argument in Open Grand Final National University Debate Championship (NUDC) 2020 and Open Grand Final World University Debate Championship (WUDC) 2021

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32585/ijelle.v3i2.1976

Keywords:

Argument form, Debate, NUDC, WUDC

Abstract

This research aimed to find out and describe forms of arguments mostly used by debaters in open grand final both NUDC 2020 and WUDC 2021. This research used descriptive qualitative method. The subjects were 8 debaters selected by a purposive sampling. The instrument of this study was observation checklist adapted from Steven Johnson’s theory. It was supported by a video recording downloaded from YouTube and transcript making from the video has been downloaded. The researchers used descriptive method to analyze the data. The result of this study showed that there were eight models of argument forms from eight debaters in video open grand final NUDC 2021, namely one simple model argument, two chain model arguments, four cluster model arguments, and one complex model argument. Meanwhile, in video open grand final WUDC 2021, there were twelve arguments from eight debaters namely three simple model arguments, one chain model argument, six cluster model arguments, and two complex model arguments. Also, the cluster argument model was the dominant model used in open grand final both NUDC 2020 and WUDC 2021.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

References

Ananda, Ririn Putri, Safnil Arsyad, and I Wayan Dharmayana. 2018. “Argumentative Features of International English Language Testing System (IELTS) Essays: A Rhetorical Analysis on Successful Exam Essays.” International Journal of Language Education 2 (1): 1–13.

Austin J. Freeley and David L. Steinberg. 19961. Argumentation and Debate : Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making. Twelfth. United States: Wadsworth.

Harvey-Smith, Neill. 2011. The Practical Guide to Debating, Worlds Style/British Parliamentary Style. IDEA.

Johnson, Steven L. 2010. Winning Debates: A Guide to Debating in the Style of the World Universities Debating Championships. IDEA.

Kawulich, Barbara B. 2004. “Data Analysis Techniques in Qualitative Research.” Journal of Research in Education 14 (1): 96–113.

PUJI ASTUTI, A Y U. 2018. “STUDENTS’PROBLEMS IN DEBATE PRACTICING IN ACADEMIC SPEAKING CLASS (A Case Study at Fourth Semester of English Education Department of Universitas Muria Kudus in Academic Year 2017/2018).” Universitas Muria Kudus.

Toulmin, Stephen E. 2003. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge university press.

Vincent, Alfredo, Yulius Kurniawan, and Nophita Trihastutie. 2018. “Argument Structure & Persuasive Techniques Used in World University Debate Championship & National University Debate Championship 2017.” In Seminar Nasional Ilmu Terapan (SNITER), 1:D07-1.

Vucetich, John A, Dawn Burnham, Paul J Johnson, Andrew J Loveridge, Michael Paul Nelson, Jeremy T Bruskotter, and David W Macdonald. 2019. “The Value of Argument Analysis for Understanding Ethical Considerations Pertaining to Trophy Hunting and Lion Conservation.” Biological Conservation 235: 260–72.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Salsabilah, S. T. (2021). Analysis Forms of Argument in Open Grand Final National University Debate Championship (NUDC) 2020 and Open Grand Final World University Debate Championship (WUDC) 2021. International Journal of English Linguistics, Literature, and Education (IJELLE), 3(2). https://doi.org/10.32585/ijelle.v3i2.1976

Issue

Section

Artikel