Analysis Forms of Argument in Open Grand Final National University Debate Championship (NUDC) 2020 and Open Grand Final World University Debate Championship (WUDC) 2021
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32585/ijelle.v3i2.1976Keywords:
Argument form, Debate, NUDC, WUDCAbstract
This research aimed to find out and describe forms of arguments mostly used by debaters in open grand final both NUDC 2020 and WUDC 2021. This research used descriptive qualitative method. The subjects were 8 debaters selected by a purposive sampling. The instrument of this study was observation checklist adapted from Steven Johnson’s theory. It was supported by a video recording downloaded from YouTube and transcript making from the video has been downloaded. The researchers used descriptive method to analyze the data. The result of this study showed that there were eight models of argument forms from eight debaters in video open grand final NUDC 2021, namely one simple model argument, two chain model arguments, four cluster model arguments, and one complex model argument. Meanwhile, in video open grand final WUDC 2021, there were twelve arguments from eight debaters namely three simple model arguments, one chain model argument, six cluster model arguments, and two complex model arguments. Also, the cluster argument model was the dominant model used in open grand final both NUDC 2020 and WUDC 2021.
References
References
Ananda, Ririn Putri, Safnil Arsyad, and I Wayan Dharmayana. 2018. “Argumentative Features of International English Language Testing System (IELTS) Essays: A Rhetorical Analysis on Successful Exam Essays.” International Journal of Language Education 2 (1): 1–13.
Austin J. Freeley and David L. Steinberg. 19961. Argumentation and Debate : Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making. Twelfth. United States: Wadsworth.
Harvey-Smith, Neill. 2011. The Practical Guide to Debating, Worlds Style/British Parliamentary Style. IDEA.
Johnson, Steven L. 2010. Winning Debates: A Guide to Debating in the Style of the World Universities Debating Championships. IDEA.
Kawulich, Barbara B. 2004. “Data Analysis Techniques in Qualitative Research.” Journal of Research in Education 14 (1): 96–113.
PUJI ASTUTI, A Y U. 2018. “STUDENTS’PROBLEMS IN DEBATE PRACTICING IN ACADEMIC SPEAKING CLASS (A Case Study at Fourth Semester of English Education Department of Universitas Muria Kudus in Academic Year 2017/2018).” Universitas Muria Kudus.
Toulmin, Stephen E. 2003. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge university press.
Vincent, Alfredo, Yulius Kurniawan, and Nophita Trihastutie. 2018. “Argument Structure & Persuasive Techniques Used in World University Debate Championship & National University Debate Championship 2017.” In Seminar Nasional Ilmu Terapan (SNITER), 1:D07-1.
Vucetich, John A, Dawn Burnham, Paul J Johnson, Andrew J Loveridge, Michael Paul Nelson, Jeremy T Bruskotter, and David W Macdonald. 2019. “The Value of Argument Analysis for Understanding Ethical Considerations Pertaining to Trophy Hunting and Lion Conservation.” Biological Conservation 235: 260–72.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the International Journal of English Linguistics, Literature, and Education (IJELLE) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
