Analisis Butir, Pilihan, dan Reliabilitas Tes Prestasi Bahasa Inggris selama Covid-19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32585/jp.v30i3.1911Abstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengungkap karakteristik ulangan bahasa Inggris semester dua siswa kelas VIII SMPN 2 Semarang tahun ajaran 2017/2018. Ciri-cirinya adalah kesukaran soal, pembedaan soal, alternatif berupa kunci jawaban dan pengecoh, dan reliabilitas. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kuantitatif untuk mengungkap karakteristik tes. Teknik analisis data menggunakan iteman versi 3.00. Data diperoleh dari wawancara dan dokumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Soal kesukaran item mencapai 23 item (57,5%) kategori mudah, 12 item (30%) kategori sedang, 5 item (12,5%) kategori sulit. (2) Diskriminasi item mencapai 9 item (22,5%) yang termasuk kategori buruk, 9 item (22,5%) kategori cukup, 17 item (42,5%) kategori baik, 5 item (12,5%) kategori sangat baik. (3) Berdasarkan alternatif, tes memiliki 65 pengecoh tidak efektif dan 55 pengecoh efektif. Soal yang memiliki semua pengecoh efektif hanya 7 butir. Untuk kunci jawaban terdapat 2 kunci jawaban dari 40 kunci jawaban yang harus di cross check. Yaitu soal nomor 3 dan soal nomor 38. (4) Reliabilitas tes adalah 0,717.References
Bernasela. (2014). An Analysis on English Summative Test Items. Tanjung Pura University.
Brown, J. D. (2001). Point-biserial Correlation Coefficients. JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 5 (3), 12–15.
Cambridge advanced learner’s dictionary (3nd ed.). (2008). Cambridge University Press.
Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. New York: CBS College.
Haryudin, A. (2015). Validity and Reliability of English Summative Tests at Junior High School in West Bandung. Jurnal Ilmiah UPT P2M STKIP Siliwangi, 2 (1), 77-90.
Hayat, B., Pranata, S. S. & Suprananto. (1997). Manual Item and TEst Analysis (ITEMAN). Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sistem Pengujian, Balitbang Dikbud.
Jandaghi, G. (2011). Assessment of Validity, Reliability and Difficulty Indices for Teacher-built Physics Exam Questions in First Year High School. Arts and Social Sciences Journal. ASSJ-16. E-ISSN: 21516200. Retrived from: http://astonjournals.com/assj
Kartowagiran, B. (2009). Pengantar Teori Tes Klasik (TTK). Makalah Pascasarjana UNY dan Dinas Pendidikan Prov DIY.
Lababa, D. (2008). Analisis Butir Soal dengan Teori Tes Klasik: IQRA’ Journal, Volume 5, 29-37.
Masruroh, H. Z. (2014). An Item Anaalysis on English Summative Test for Second Grade Students of MAN Tulungagung 1 in Academic Year 2013/2014. A Script: State Islamic Institute Tulungagung.
Mulianah, S. & Hidayat, W. (2013). Pengembangan Tes Berbasis Komputer. Kuriositas, 2(6), 27- 43.
Mutaqi. (2007). Analisis Butir Soal Terhadap Instrumen Evaluasi Kegiatan Diklat. Materi Workshop Direktur Diklat di UDIKLAT PT PLN (PERSERO) Semarang, 9 April 2007.
Nurgiyantoro, B., Gunawan, Marzuki. (2002). Statistik Terapan Untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Putri, N. S. (2015). An Analysis of English Semester Test Items based on The Criteria of A Good Test for The First Semester of The First Year of SMK Negeri 1 Gedong Tataan in 2012/2013 Academic Year. A Script: Lampung University.
Richard & Sheila. (1999). Item Analysis for Criterion-Referenced Tests. New York: Research Foundation of SUNY/Center for Development of Human Services.
Roid, G. H. & Haladyna, T. M. (1982). A Technology for Test-Item Writing. London: Academic Press, Inc.
Roszkowski, M. J., & Spreat, S. (2011). Issues to consider when evaluating “tests”. In Financial planning and counseling scales, 13-31. Springer New York.
Rudyatmi, Ely & Rusllowati, A. (2017). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Semarang: Faculty of Mathematics and Science Unnes.
Rusmiana, F.D. (2015). The Test Item Analysis of 1st Semester Final Test of The Accounting Theory for Vocational Education: Case Study of SMK YPKK 1 Sleman Academic Year of 2014/2015. A Thesis: Yogyakarta State University.
Shomami, A. (2014). An Item Analysis of English Summative Test. A Script: Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University.
Singh, J. P., Kariwal P., Gupta S.B., & Shrotriya V.P. (2014). Improving Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) through item analysis: An assessment of the assessment tool. International Journal of Sciences & Applied Research, 1(2), 53-57. Retrived from: www.ijsar.in
Sudijono, A. (2011). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Suhr, D. (2003). reliability, exploratory & confirmatory factor analysis for the scale of athletic priorities. Retrieved from: http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi28/274-28.pdf
Suwarto. (2004). Analsis Item dalam Pembutan Tes. Education Jounal,13(3), 289-300.
Suwarto. (2007). Tingkat Kesulitan, Daya Beda, dan Reliabilitas Tes Menurut Teori Tes Klasik. Journal Pendidikan, 16 (2), 166-178.
Suwarto. (2011). Teori Tes Klasik dan Teori Tes Modern. Widyatama, 1(20). 69-78.
Suwarto. (2013). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Dalam Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Suwarto. (2013). Tingkat Kesulitan, Daya Beda, dan Realibilitas Tes Ujian Seleksi Mahasiswa Baru Universitas Veeran Bangun Nusantara Sukoharjo. National Seminar on Science Education: p. 652- 658.
Suwarto. (2016). Karakteristik Tes Biologi Kelas 7 Semester Gasal. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora. 17(1), 1-8.
Suwarto. (2018). Statistik Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright to this article is transferred to Jurnal Pendidikan if and when the article is accepted for publication under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to Jurnal Pendidikan. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
1. This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
2. It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above-mentioned paper in whole to Jurnal Pendidikan. The copyright transfer covers the right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online), or any other reproductions of similar nature. The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
1. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the work.
2. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the work or derivative works for the author’s personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the Jurnal Pendidikan copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies Jurnal Pendidikan endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
3. Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
Jurnal Pendidikan by http://journal.univetbantara.ac.id/index.php/jp is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
